10 Common Misperceptions About Fossil Cats and Where They Come From

The evolution of cats?

As far as I’m concerned, Life, the Universe, and Everything appeared just so this young lion could get that much satisfaction from a green rubber ball. You’re welcome, Leo.

We’re done here . . .

Wait. Why pass up such a fascinating topic?

It may take a PhD to cover every detail of where cats come from and where they might be going, but some of the most interesting highlights aren’t at all hard to understand.

Let’s check out ten common misconceptions about fossil cats and how they turned into the modern cat family Felidae.

To start off, most people think that . . .

 

Chillin

10. Dogs and cats are unrelated.

Cats and dogs work hard to keep this misconception going, but they’re actually “kissing cousins.” Well, sort of.

Not much hard evidence of the carnivoran family tree has survived the last sixty-six million years of geologic activity, but paleontologists still comb through fossil beds, searching for the last common ancestor of dogs and cats.

There must have been a hungry little mammal – they were all little back then (Rose) – that either survived the K/T extinction or developed very soon afterwards, during the first epoch of the Age of Mammals – the Paleocene. (Benton and others, page 66; Fox and others; Nyakatura and Bininda-Emonds, 2012)

How do the boffins know that?

From cat and dog teeth, specifically, certain upper and lower cheek teeth that fit together like scissors blades.

They’re called carnassials, after the French word for “carnivorous.”

Carnassials are why Fluffy rarely takes food from your hand. The cat has to use its cheek teeth on food.

Its impressive fangs and incisors are specialized murder tools, as we’ll see in #6 later.

Carnassials
Carnassials of a: (A) bear; (B) leopard; (C) dog; and (D) badger.

As you can see, cats and dogs aren’t the only ones with carnassials. All members of the biological order Carnivora have them. (Revell)

It’s always the same teeth, too – the last premolar on the upper jaw and the first molar on the lower jaw. (University of California Museum of Paleontology)

This means that all carnivorans inherited their carnassials from the same ancestor.

That’s the K/T-surviving and/or fast-evolving animal paleontologists would love to identify in the geologic record.

Now, the next misconception is something that every zoo visitor and safari adventurer takes for granted. Scientists once thought it was true, too.

 

Lion and hyena

9. Hyenas and the big cats are unrelated.

Not surprisingly, wildlife biologists used to classify hyenas as caniforms. (World Heritage Encyclopedia) That’s science-speak for “dog-like.”

Today’s caniforms include (but aren’t limited to) dogs, wolves, foxes, skunks, bears, weasels, badgers, wolverines, raccoons, and . . . walruses?

Yes, and otters and seals, too. Not killer whales, though. (Heske)

Hyenas were moved out of the group when genetic testing showed that they are really feliforms, though it isn’t clear exactly how they fit in with the rest of the “cat-like” carnivorans. (Barycka)

Feliforms include families you don’t usually think of as related to cats until you see them all together. Here are modern representatives of the whole feliform group (Heske):

Feliformia-480x270
Feliforms, going clockwise: Yellow mongooses (“Herpestidae”), a genetta (“Viverridae”), a hyena (“Hyaenidae”), a fossa (“Eupleridae”), an African palm civet (“Nandinia”), and Fluffy.

OK, the hyena still seems strange there, but molecular analyses don’t lie.

By the way, meerkatts are in the mongoose family. They are smart, but cheetahs are smarter.

Since paleontologists are still looking for the last common ancestor of dogs and cats, you probably won’t be surprised to hear that no one knows for sure when these two groups went their separate ways.

The oldest known caniform and feliform fossils go back to the Eocene – the second epoch of the Age of Mammals. However, molecular studies suggest that the big break may have happened long before then. (Benton and others; Nyakatura and Bininda-Emonds, 2012; University of Edinburgh)

The exact date hasn’t been pinned down yet. Some researchers think . . . Uh-oh. Let’s move on – something really horrible has just appeared in the tree branches over your head . . . act casual and don’t turn your back on it.

 

Smilodon_californicus_saber-toothed_tiger_(La_Brea_Asphalt,_Upper_Pleistocene;_Rancho_La_Brea_tar_pits,_Los_Angeles,_southern_California,_USA)_2_(15256732527)
Smilodon fatalis.

Continue reading 10 Common Misperceptions About Fossil Cats and Where They Come From

Housecats and Wildcats (Fluffy and Silvester)

Ever wondered if different kinds of housecat – like a tabby and a Persian, or street cats and purebreds – are different species?

Biologists say that these animals all have the same formal last name (for species or subspecies) – catus.

So it’s all one group despite appearances or lifestyle.

The biologists then politely excuse themselves and get back to work, because the real challenge is telling housecats and wildcats apart, and they’re working under a wildcat conservation deadline.

What’s a wildcat?

Well, it’s not that beautiful animal at the top of this post. That is a housecat – a pedigreed Norwegian forest cat, in fact. It’s a catus.

Here’s a wildcat, photographed in a German national forest:

800px-European_Wildcat_Nationalpark_Bayerischer_Wald_02
It won’t follow you home, no matter how friendly and gentle you are. European wildcats are mostly untameable. (Sunquist and Sunquist, 2002)

The resemblance between these two particular cats is eerie!

Fluffy the Housecat and Silvester the Wildcat don’t always look that much alike. Cat fanciers have worked hard to maintain a wildcat appearance in the Norwegian fancy-breed.

It’s quite an achievement. The breeders are limited to the human time scale, while European wildcats have had hundreds of thousands of years – since roughly the middle of the Pleistocene – to develop their look. (Yamaguchi and others, 2004)

Wildcats are formally known as Felis silvestris. (It’s usually abbrevated as F. s..)

So, even though the cats above are almost mirror images, they belong in different subgroups – catus and silvestris, respectively.

Still, Nordic “twins” aside, housecats and wildcats do have a lot in common.

Flying wildcat
Spot quiz: Domestic cat, wildcat, or a new Marvel character? The bushy ringed tail, with its blunt tip, clues us in that this is a Scottish wildcat. Actually, its nickname – Highland Tiger – would make a good Marvel character name!

Fluffy and Silvester deserve their own post in this series on cat evolution because:

  • Obviously, they’re closely related. But some of the best minds on the planet can’t agree whether domestic cats and wildcats are two different species (Felis catus and Felis silvestris) or just subgroups of the same one, i.e., F. s. catus and F. s. [wildcat subspecies name]. It’s just words to us, but the uncertainty can really mess up legal efforts to protect wildcats. (Macdonald and others)
  • Our own history is part of the story. Cats have associated with human beings for at least ten thousand years. (Vigne and others, 2012) During that time, we’ve carried Fluffy all over the world. And in the last century and a half, we have also dramatically changed its appearance through a system of artificial selection called the cat fancy.
  • Housecats and wildcats interbreed so much that it’s almost impossible to find “pure” wildcats in some parts of Europe. This prompts warnings that wildcats are at risk for genetic extinction. But doesn’t interbreeding show that catus and silvestris are the same species? And how can having kittens make the parents go extinct? The biologists are working on these and other questions.

Let’s start off with the cats closest to us – the few that are fancy-breeds as well as the many unpedigreed domestic cats that share our homes, yards, and streets.

Then we will get a little better acquainted with Silvester and see how some wildcats might have been domesticated.

After a brief outline of Fluffy’s history, we’ll check out the issue of genetic extinction – what it is and what it could mean for people – especially cat owners – as well as wildcats.

Feral cats, fancy breeds, and housecats

You aren’t imagining things – there really are a lot of cats out there, 600 million of them associated with households and another 600 million unowned, roaming and reproducing freely (Driscoll and others, 2011), i.e., feral cats. (Robertson)

“Feral” does mean “wild,” but these aren’t wildcats. Wildcats are, well, wild – feral cats were once domestic or else have very close relatives that are domesticated.

wp-1475011444023.jpeg
Some cats haunt the borderland between feral and domestic.

Feral cats exist wherever people live or have lived. It’s a worldwide problem, and one that we humans have caused. (Robertson)

But in this post they are only relevant to the wildcat conservation issue, so we’ll talk about feral cats later.

What about the hundreds of millions of owned cats? Who really owns whom?

In other words, are housecats really domesticated?

Continue reading Housecats and Wildcats (Fluffy and Silvester)

All the Cats in the World Except Fluffy and Silvester

It’s enormous fun to look at cat evolution, because you get to look at cats. Even people who don’t like pet cats are impressed by cheetahs, lions, and tigers.

Cheetah dramatic
How did life on Earth come up with something like this . . . and housecats and lions, too?

There are actually more cats out in the wild than most of us have ever dreamed of, including the gorgeous Asiatic golden cat shown at the top of this post.

Today we are going to look at all of them, except for Fluffy and its wildcat relatives. I’m saving them until next time for two reasons:

  • The biological line between housecats and their ancestors – the wildcats (one word) – is blurry, so we need to check them out all together.
  • We do need to talk about how cats evolved. Even though that happened to wild cats (two words) over millions of years, Fluffy’s history is helpful. Cat breeders have been intentionally messing with its genes for over a century. Is the process that has given us the tailless Manx and the bald Donskoy typical of all evolution? Tune in next time and find out!
Evolution of catcher(0)
Evolution would be great fun, too, if it worked like this. Sadly, it doesn’t, unless evolution is a lot weirder than experts think – and that’s very weird. Cats continue to play with toys and humans still must work their way through the bush leagues for a chance to play in The Show.

The following eight sections are based on the eight genetic lineages that DNA sequencing consistently shows in the cat family. (Johnson and others, 2006; Nyakatura and Bininda-Emonds)

They aren’t presented in the order in which each group evolved – those dates come out differently for different researchers. So far, I think, the only consensus is that there are eight lineages.

The pictures have all been generously donated to either Creative Commons or the public domain by many generous photographers.  Be sure to check out their links in the image credits at the end of this post!

Let’s start out with the lineage that contains the cat featured at the top of this post – the Asiatic golden cat, known locally as the “fire tiger.” (Sunquist and Sunquist, 2002)

Then we’ll check out the big cats and the other six lineages.
Continue reading All the Cats in the World Except Fluffy and Silvester

The Evolution of Cats: 6: Nimravides and the Metailurini

It’s time to look at “the other sabertooths.”

Some of them are also called “false sabertooths.” (Antón)

Whether false or true, these now-extinct animals are giving scientists useful insights into the world of sabertoothed cats.

You probably haven’t heard of them.

Everybody knows Smilodon – the California state fossil and star of Ice Age. Quite a few laypeople recognize the name of Homotherium, too.

homotherium-profile
Homotherium’s teeth weren’t as long as Smilodon’s and it had a lighter build.

We met both of these and other popular sabertoothed cats last time.

But hardly anyone outside the Paleontology Department’s “cat” section has ever heard of Nimravides or the Metailurini.

As one noted geoscientist puts it:
“I am fond of saying that a geologist writes like a person overcoming very grave reservations. This is because no geologist can operate as an earth historian without continuously doubting such opinions—regardless of the accuracy of the observations upon which they are based. The realization of our uncertainty makes us uneasy, as does knowing that our explanations of the past are not more true, but only more plausible, than the stories told by creationists, extraterrestrialists, and other seers.” (Van Couvering)

When talking about fossil cats, paleontologists still have many “grave reservations” to overcome.

Very few of those issues came up last time, when we checked out the Homotheriini and the Smilodontini.

smilodon-cope
Smilodon, as the 19th century saw it.  This fossil sabertooth is still wildly popular in the 21st century.

Those sabertooths get a lot of attention from the public as well as researchers, and paleontologists have researched them in great detail. (Werdelin and others)
However, the two tribes weren’t the only toothy big cats around during the Miocene epoch and the Plio-Pleistocene ice ages.

No history of feline evolution is complete without mention of:

  • Nimravides. Long-legged and the size of a modern lion (Hunt, 2004), this was a mysterious North American saber-cat.
  • The Metailurini. Part sabertooth, part “normal” cat, these predators had a much wider range than Nimravides. Some of them were the most common Pliocene felids in Africa. (Werdelin and Dehghani)
632px-metailurus_metailurus_major_asenovgrad2
Metailurus is nowhere near as charismatic as Smilodon, but scientists are very curious about this cougar-like Miocene cat.  Was it a sabertooth or not?

 

Aside from the occasional complete skeleton, most of the other sabertooth fossils are fragments that can be interpreted in different ways. (Turner and Antón)

Of course this leads to lots of scientific controversy.

Yet the basic facts about Nimravides and the Metailurini are clear enough.

Both cat groups developed around the same time as the early members of the Homotheriini and Smilodontini. Then they coexisted with the two tribes for millions of years.

Nimravides didn’t make it out of the Miocene epoch (Werdelin and others), but the last member of the Metailurini died relatively recently, during the second half of the Pleistocene. (Werdelin and Dehghani)

All of them were very successful predators, and here is their story, as far as researchers have been able to outline it to date.

Continue reading The Evolution of Cats: 6: Nimravides and the Metailurini

The Evolution of Cats: 5. Sabertooths, Part 1

A multi-million-year predator niche has been empty for the last 11,000 years.

We should be celebrating that fact. Instead, we have forgotten the terror that these ferocious animals inspired in our ancestors.

We wish they were still around.

Well, it’s understandable. If safety could be guaranteed, who wouldn’t want to go see a live sabertoothed cat at the zoo?

If…

Paleontologists have gotten DNA from well-preserved fossils of the two most famous sabertooths – Smilodon and Homotherium. (Barnett and others)

But if Jurassic Park-style cloning really worked LINK, safety could not be guaranteed in the saber-cat enclosure.

Nobody knows how these extinct animals behaved.

Some of them were probably good jumpers (Morales and others); most could climb; and a few behemoths had the brutal momentum that a half-ton body mass makes possible when they charged. (Antón; Turner and Antón)

Anyway, they were all cats and therefore moody, quick to react, and unpredictable.

wp-1485383923174.jpeg
A modern human would be eyeball-to-eyeball with Smilodon populator here.

Yet, despite the risks, we all so want to see a sabertoothed cat!

The idea of a living sabertooth isn’t total fantasy. It’s very unlikely, but a new one really could appear any day.

After all, evolution is still going on.

And for the last fifty million years (Antón), that ambush-and-slash niche for sabertoothed mammals has always been refilled after a brief vacancy. Then it has been occupied for tens of millions of years at a stretch.

wp-1485383666152.jpeg
We could all go back to caves . . .


It’s good to be an apex predator.

Cats didn’t invent saberteeth. These killing tools go back to the days before mammals.

How did cats get them and why aren’t there any sabertooths around today?

Saberteeth

All cats are hypercarnivores. That’s why Fluffy the Housecat can’t live on dog food – it needs the special balance of protein and amino acids that canned and dry cat food contains.

In the wild, cats depend on prey animals. To survive, their canine teeth have evolved into fangs. (Holliday and Steppan; Kitchener and others)

Bengal tigers have the largest fangs of any modern cat – up to 4 inches (10 cm) long. (Heske, Lab 19)

wp-1485383561018.jpeg
The fangs of this Brazilian jaguar along the Rio Negro are impressive, too.


In comparison, Smilodon’s saberteeth were almost a foot (28 cm) long. (van den Hoek Ostende and others) But those weren’t really fangs.

In today’s big cats, upper fangs are rather cone-shaped – thick at the base and tapering up into a point.

Saberteeth were much flatter, front to back, than the fangs of any “normal” modern cat. (Martin, 1980; van den Hoek Ostende and others)

The edges looked like knives. Indeed, the technical name for sabertoothed cats is Machairodontinae, which means “Knife-Tooths.” (Antón; Turner and others)

But appearances are deceptive. Saberteeth were actually blunter than a steel blade, although sometimes they were serrated. (Turner and Antón)

Mechanical experiments show that saberteeth could only cut through hide and animal tissues when the cat also made a slicing movement during its killing bite. (Wheeler)


Hence the name ambush-and-SLASH for a sabertoothed predator. In contrast, all modern cats use a stalk-and-pounce hunting technique. (Werdelin, 1989)

Paleontologists say that there are subtle differences in saberteeth between two major sabertoothed cat tribes, the Homotheriini and the Smilodontini.

Homotherium and its relatives were scimitar-toothed. Their saberteeth tended to be broad and very flat, with coarse serrations. (Antón; Martin, 1980)

wp-1485383715410.jpeg
Homotherium


The Smilodontini were dirk-toothed cats. Their sabers were generally longer and straighter, less flattened, and with very fine serrations to none at all. (Antón; Martin, 1980)

wp-1485383908225.jpeg
Smilodon populator was an extreme dirk-tooth.  

Per Antón, the species name “necator” isn’t used any more.

These subtle differences matter a lot to experts. That’s why you’ll often see “dirk-tooth” or “scimitar-tooth” on the Web or in books about sabertoothed cats.

But for general purposes, it’s still perfectly okay to just call them all sabertooths.

Sabertooths down through time


These specialized upper canine teeth aren’t all that unusual in fossil carnivores.

Since the K/T extinction sixty-five million years ago, at least four mammal groups have had them. (Kitchener and others)

All four, plus the very first sabertooths – those Permian gorgonopsids we met last time – are shown here, drawn to scale:

wp-1485383835746.jpeg

That must be The Doctor. Only a Time Lord could get into such a predicament – millions of years actually separate some of these animals from the others.
Continue reading The Evolution of Cats: 5. Sabertooths, Part 1

 The Evolution of Cats:  4.  The First Cat

Last time, Silvester the African wildcat showed how our own housecat would live out in the wild . . . as long as the habitat was a place like the Kalahari plain in southern Africa.

Fluffy’s style would have to change if it lived in a swampy jungle or high up in the Andes.

Yes, there are small cats in the Andes. Andean mountain cats are rare and hard to study. (Sunquist and Sunquist)

Felids (members of the cat family Felidae) are up to the challenge. These very adaptable animals are found all over the world today.

They are also in the geologic record. For tens of millions of years cats have always:

  • Competed with each other in all these places
  • Hunted prey that was evolving rapidly and in diverse ways
  • Had sex and raised kittens
  • Coped as best they could with other community predators that ranged from prehistoric giant beardogs; through the very cat-like ancient nimravids and barbourofelids that we will meet next time; to today’s Homo sapiens.

That’s a lot of work. No wonder modern cats tend to be a little irritable!

This jaguar looks a little like the Joker!

Those interactions with the environment and with other living members of their communities have, of course, influenced the evolution of cats in many ways.

We need this broader post now to move beyond Silvester and take a very general look at how the first cats evolved.

Then, next time, we can meet some of them, starting with the sabertooths.

Now, ladies and gentleman, set aside some time for reading – this post does cover a central idea in my book, that the evolution of cats was an epic  – and step this way into the time machine . . .

(Mind the gorgon, the T. rex, and the angry quoll.)

Humble beginnings

Many of the complex feline features that we admire today actually evolved to meet a vital but simple need in the past.

Sometimes this need arose a very long time ago.

Believe it or not, a cat’s beautiful coat; its claws, whiskers, and teeth; and the glands it uses to advertise for a mate and to mark its territory all come from integument (Chuong and Harberger) – that is, from skin.

Cats are still recuperating from the evolutionary effort.

Integument first evolved in some of the oldest ancestors of mammals and reptiles.

Those former fish needed the outer covering to protect themselves from dehydration, now that they were spending more and more time out of the water.  (Alibardi)

Integument of various shapes and qualities also helped them slither around or pull themselves along as they colonized the land.  (Alibardi)

Today, molecular biologists say that things like claws and teeth come from the integument’s epithelial stem cells.

These cells can be organized in lots of different ways.  (Chuong and Harberger)

Exactly how this works isn’t well understood yet, but it has indeed led to the diversity of today’s animals. (Chuong and Harberger)

The development of integument is one of the points where the story of cat evolution (and much else) really begins.

We need to go back 350 million years for it (Benton and others) – a much longer span of time than the 65 million years or so that have passed since the K/T extinction of nonavian dinosaurs and some other forms of Cretaceous life.

A modern avian dinosaur poses with data from the geological record. Feathers developed from integument, too. (Chuong and Harberger)

We would have needed a time machine anyway.  Cats are mammals, after all, and the Linnean order Mammalia is very old.

You might have heard that the Age of Mammals began when nonavian dinosaurs went away.

Actually, that’s just the Cenozoic – sixty-five million years of what scientists who take the really long view call “recent life.”

Mammal beginnings are nowhere near as recent as that.

Mammals and dinosaurs

Two-thirds of the real Age of Mammals was already over (Kielan-Jaworowska) when a killer bolide suddenly appeared in Cretaceous skies.
Continue reading  The Evolution of Cats:  4.  The First Cat

The Evolution of Cats: 3.  Fluffy’s African Granddaddy

As we saw last time, laypeople have a lot of questions about Fluffy the housecat and where this quirky little animal and its relatives fit into our shared Universe.

There are still many blanks in the scientific puzzle that’s the evolution of cats, but specialists in everything from paleontology to genetics are fitting quite a few of the pieces together.

Blog posts here and eventually the book Where Cats Come From describe what I understand those experts to be saying about their work.

The easiest way to begin is by looking at Fluffy.  Housecats are built and act the same as the big cats, and they’re a lot more convenient to use as models.  (Turner and Antón)

However, this approach has its limits because ten thousand years of domestication (Clutton-Brock; Driscoll and others; O’Brien and others) and a century and a half of the cat fancy have reshaped the housecat right down to its genes.

We need to get a little more wild if we’re going to look at the evolution of all cats, including the big ones.

Let’s leave Fluffy in the house for now and visit its nearest ancestor, the African wildcat. (Driscoll and others; O’Brien and others)

Introducing Silvester

There are a lot more small cat species out there than most of us realize, but many people in Europe, Africa, and the Middle/Near East probably have heard of the group called wildcats.
These aren’t bobcats or other medium-sized or small cats.  As you can see up above, wildcats actually look a lot like housecats.

That resemblance is not a coincidence.

Continue reading The Evolution of Cats: 3.  Fluffy’s African Granddaddy